[rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- From: Allen Zak <azak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:40:58 -0400
On Aug 28, 2007, at 11:05 PM, Marc James Small wrote:
At 10:57 PM 8/28/2007, Jerry Lehrer wrote:
>RUGers
>
>As usual, Richard is right. The thread form is 60 degrees, NOT the
>Whitworth 55 degrees.
>
>The word Whitworth makes my skin crawl, thinking of my early days
>working on my MG TD,
>Cad-Allard, Jaguar or AC-Bristol. Al those used a mixture of thread
>und wrench standards.
>I only reached fastener sanity with Porsche and the Metric system.
Jerry
You are an engineer and you should appreciate this. Whitworth was the
ONLY engineer-designed thread system in which cost of production was
not made a factor. The team designing it was just told to make the
best thread system they could and the one least likely to come
unscrewed under stress. All later systems (DIN, UN, &c) were made by
engineers ordered to make the cheapest possible thread system which
was reasonably decent. DIN was reworded in the Second World War to
decrease its cost of production, and the UN system was specifically
intended as an economical system of fasteners to speed up war
production while providing a common thread-system for use by all
Allied nations.
Incidentally, Whitworth was the only thread system in use in
microscope production until the Second World War even for Japanese or
Soviet made gear. Even today, many parts of a microscope, such as the
objective mounting, are still in Whitworth. (That objective thread,
incidentally, is the Royal Microscope Society Thread-Mount, the
so-called, "Royal Screw", of 0.795 inches by 36 turns-per-inch
Whitworth -- I had a friend call me this evening and ask me for it, so
its dimensions are fresh in my mind.)
Marc
At last we learn the actual measurements of a royal screw.
Allen Zak
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- Follow-Ups:
- [rollei_list] ADMIN: My Brief Absence
- From: Marc James Small
- References:
- [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- From: SandyF.
- [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- From: Laurence Cuffe
- [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- From: Frank Dernie
- [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- From: Jerry Lehrer
- [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- From: Marc James Small
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- » [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- » [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- » [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- » [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- » [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- » [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- » [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- » [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- » [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- » [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- » [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- » [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- » [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- » [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- » [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- » [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- » [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- » [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- » [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- » [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- » [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- » [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- » [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- » [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
At 10:57 PM 8/28/2007, Jerry Lehrer wrote: >RUGers > >As usual, Richard is right. The thread form is 60 degrees, NOT the >Whitworth 55 degrees. > >The word Whitworth makes my skin crawl, thinking of my early days >working on my MG TD, >Cad-Allard, Jaguar or AC-Bristol. Al those used a mixture of thread >und wrench standards. >I only reached fastener sanity with Porsche and the Metric system. JerryYou are an engineer and you should appreciate this. Whitworth was the ONLY engineer-designed thread system in which cost of production was not made a factor. The team designing it was just told to make the best thread system they could and the one least likely to come unscrewed under stress. All later systems (DIN, UN, &c) were made by engineers ordered to make the cheapest possible thread system which was reasonably decent. DIN was reworded in the Second World War to decrease its cost of production, and the UN system was specifically intended as an economical system of fasteners to speed up war production while providing a common thread-system for use by all Allied nations.
Incidentally, Whitworth was the only thread system in use in microscope production until the Second World War even for Japanese or Soviet made gear. Even today, many parts of a microscope, such as the objective mounting, are still in Whitworth. (That objective thread, incidentally, is the Royal Microscope Society Thread-Mount, the so-called, "Royal Screw", of 0.795 inches by 36 turns-per-inch Whitworth -- I had a friend call me this evening and ask me for it, so its dimensions are fresh in my mind.)
Marc
- [rollei_list] ADMIN: My Brief Absence
- From: Marc James Small
- [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- From: SandyF.
- [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- From: Laurence Cuffe
- [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- From: Frank Dernie
- [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- From: Jerry Lehrer
- [rollei_list] Re: ?? True Sizes of Tripod Mounting Holes
- From: Marc James Small