[rollei_list] Re: Scanning B&W
- From: ERoustom <eroustom@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 08:47:35 -0400
And here's a little more from http://www.asf.com/support/Scanners/
FilmICE3FAQs.shtml#Q2
Q2:
Can Black & White film be used with DIGITAL ICE³ Technology?
A2:
DIGITAL ICE³ Technology consists of three applications: DIGITAL ICE,
DIGITAL ROC and DIGITAL GEM Technologies. If the DIGITAL ICE function
is enabled, then Black & White chromogenic films (C41 process) can be
used (for example Kodak Advantix 400, Illford XP2 Super, Konica
Monochrome VX400, Kodak Select B&W+400 and Kodak T400 CN). When
scanning these films for DIGITAL ICE³ Technology implementation, the
film must be scanned as a color image. After DIGITAL ICE³ processing,
the color image may be converted to B&W using an image editor.
Traditional silver-halide Black & White film cannot be used with
DIGITAL ICE enabled. If the DIGITAL ICE function is disabled while
the DIGITAL ROC and DIGITAL GEM functions remain enabled, then all
traditional silver-halide and chromogenic Black & White film can be
used. When scanning the Black & White film for DIGITAL ROC and
DIGITAL GEM implementation, the film must be scanned as a color
image. After DIGITAL ROC and DIGITAL GEM processing, the color image
may be converted to Black & White using an image editor
On Oct 5, 2006, at 8:30 AM, ERoustom wrote:
You might all like to read this page:
http://www.largeformatphotography.info/1800F-bw.html
E.
If anybody has information on that -
On Oct 5, 2006, at 4:35 AM, chatanooga@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Silver I believe is a problem because its transparent to whatever
'beam' is issued during the ICE dust detection phase. I just
looked at a Kodak web-site and they say it doesnt work for 'silver-
halide' films but no problem with C41.
On Oct 4, 2006, at 7:08 AM, chatanooga@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I suspect silver is still the problem but no harm to ask!
> Chat
>
Why is silver a problem?
---
- References:
- [rollei_list] Re: News from Rollei-Berlin : no more digital cameras but new "Slide Direkt" B&W slide film
- From: Carlos Manuel Freaza
- [rollei_list] Re: B&W slides, why should we care for them ?
- From: bigler
- [rollei_list] Re: B&W slides, why should we care for them ?
- From: chatanooga
- [rollei_list] Re: B&W slides, why should we care for them ?
- From: ERoustom
- [rollei_list] Re: B&W slides, why should we care for them ?
- From: chatanooga
- [rollei_list] Re: Scanning B&W
- From: ERoustom
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanning B&W
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanning B&W
You might all like to read this page: http://www.largeformatphotography.info/1800F-bw.html
E.
If anybody has information on that - On Oct 5, 2006, at 4:35 AM, chatanooga@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Silver I believe is a problem because its transparent to whatever 'beam' is issued during the ICE dust detection phase. I just looked at a Kodak web-site and they say it doesnt work for 'silver- halide' films but no problem with C41.
On Oct 4, 2006, at 7:08 AM, chatanooga@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > I suspect silver is still the problem but no harm to ask! > Chat >
Why is silver a problem? ---
- [rollei_list] Re: News from Rollei-Berlin : no more digital cameras but new "Slide Direkt" B&W slide film
- From: Carlos Manuel Freaza
- [rollei_list] Re: B&W slides, why should we care for them ?
- From: bigler
- [rollei_list] Re: B&W slides, why should we care for them ?
- From: chatanooga
- [rollei_list] Re: B&W slides, why should we care for them ?
- From: ERoustom
- [rollei_list] Re: B&W slides, why should we care for them ?
- From: chatanooga
- [rollei_list] Re: Scanning B&W
- From: ERoustom