[rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- From: Slobodan Dimitrov <s.dimitrov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:26:39 -0700
By the way, the softener of choice during the darkroom halcyon days
was the cigarette pack/box plastic wrapper, crumpled up. Used by a
deft practitioner, it's application could also reduce grain without
loosing sharpness.
Being a non-smoker, I had to mooch mine from friends that did.
Slobodan Dimitrov
Studio G-8,
Angels Gate Cultural Center
http://sdimitrovphoto.com
On Jul 29, 2006, at 12:52 PM, Don Williams wrote:
At 11:46 PM 7/28/2006 -0700, Richard Knoppow wrote:
The softness and character of the defocused image from a lens is
pretty complex. I suppose one could duplicate it with an image
editor. The image from a lens of a three dimensional scene is also
three diminsional so the nature of the defocused image is
important. PhotoShop can produce some interesting blurs and one
can mask the image to make whatever part of one wants blurry but I
don't think it ever looks quite like the effect from a lens.
I spent quite a long time learning how to make really sharp
images. Once I figured that out I began to experiment with soft
focus.
Soft focus produced in an enlarger from a negative is
fundamentally different than soft focus from the camera. The
effect of spherical aberration or a soft filter is to spread out
the highlights. When the same device is used in an enlarger the
shadows are spread out unless one is printing from a transparency.
Even then the three diminsional effects are missing. There is room
for both effects.
I was sure you and Slobodan would be one among the responders.
I wanted to say something very similar but just couldn't think of a
way of expressing it.
With respect to PhotoShop, I am a complete failure at defining an
area to mask, I suppose because I use a track ball. I would guess
that a mouse with a large range of physical travel would help.
Thanks,
DAW
Don Williams
La Jolla, CA
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- References:
- [rollei_list] Re: Jeffery PAW - Week 30
- From: Carlos Manuel Freaza
- [rollei_list] Scanner advice needed, please
- From: Craig Roberts
- [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- From: David Dodge
- [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- From: Don Williams
- [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- From: Don Williams
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
The softness and character of the defocused image from a lens is pretty complex. I suppose one could duplicate it with an image editor. The image from a lens of a three dimensional scene is also three diminsional so the nature of the defocused image is important. PhotoShop can produce some interesting blurs and one can mask the image to make whatever part of one wants blurry but I don't think it ever looks quite like the effect from a lens.
I spent quite a long time learning how to make really sharp images. Once I figured that out I began to experiment with soft focus.
Soft focus produced in an enlarger from a negative is fundamentally different than soft focus from the camera. The effect of spherical aberration or a soft filter is to spread out the highlights. When the same device is used in an enlarger the shadows are spread out unless one is printing from a transparency. Even then the three diminsional effects are missing. There is room for both effects.
I was sure you and Slobodan would be one among the responders.
I wanted to say something very similar but just couldn't think of a way of expressing it.
With respect to PhotoShop, I am a complete failure at defining an area to mask, I suppose because I use a track ball. I would guess that a mouse with a large range of physical travel would help.
Thanks,
DAW
Don Williams La Jolla, CA
- [rollei_list] Re: Jeffery PAW - Week 30
- From: Carlos Manuel Freaza
- [rollei_list] Scanner advice needed, please
- From: Craig Roberts
- [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- From: David Dodge
- [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- From: Don Williams
- [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- From: Don Williams