[rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- From: Slobodan Dimitrov <s.dimitrov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 20:35:09 -0700
Rolleisoft and darkroom softening are two different things. The
exposure on the negative with a soft filter allows for the highlights
to bleed into the dark areas. In the darkroom it is reversed. A
combination of both can used.
A master of the softened image was Norman Seef (MD).
Slobodan Dimitrov
Studio G-8,
Angels Gate Cultural Center
http://sdimitrovphoto.com
On Jul 28, 2006, at 7:56 PM, Don Williams wrote:
At 10:37 PM 7/28/2006 -0400, David Dodge wrote, in part:
I hold with Cartier Bresson that "Sharpness is a bourgeois
virtue" :-).
There have been some recent posts on this forum and on the Exakta
forum about using older or "softer" primary lenses, in one case
there is a contest running in which only 3 element lenses can be
used (actually a cemented 4th element doesn't count).
Someone, don't remember who, said he preferred to take the sharpest
possible photos and then degrade them with PhotoShop, or in the
darkroom.
I would guess that there are folks on this list who will make a
strong case that the effect one gets by using a soft lens in the
camera is entirely different than what one gets with PhotoShop or
in darkroom processing, regardless of the darkroom process used.
If this is not the case, how did Rollei manage to make money
selling Rolleisoft adapter lenses if the same thing could be done
in the darkroom in the olden days?
Anyone have any opinions about this?
About scanners, I'm still hanging in with my old CanoScan D 1230U.
I can only print up to 8X10 so maybe I would want a different
scanner if I had a larger printer, or sent files out for printing.
(I do both medium format and 35mm slides and negatives, and of
course scan a lot of documents for OCR, and pictures for
reproduction. Seems to meet my needs) What am I missing?
Don Williams
La Jolla, CA
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- References:
- [rollei_list] Re: Jeffery PAW - Week 30
- From: Carlos Manuel Freaza
- [rollei_list] Scanner advice needed, please
- From: Craig Roberts
- [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- From: David Dodge
- [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- From: Don Williams
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- » [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
I hold with Cartier Bresson that "Sharpness is a bourgeois virtue" :-).
There have been some recent posts on this forum and on the Exakta forum about using older or "softer" primary lenses, in one case there is a contest running in which only 3 element lenses can be used (actually a cemented 4th element doesn't count).
Someone, don't remember who, said he preferred to take the sharpest possible photos and then degrade them with PhotoShop, or in the darkroom.
I would guess that there are folks on this list who will make a strong case that the effect one gets by using a soft lens in the camera is entirely different than what one gets with PhotoShop or in darkroom processing, regardless of the darkroom process used.
If this is not the case, how did Rollei manage to make money selling Rolleisoft adapter lenses if the same thing could be done in the darkroom in the olden days?
Anyone have any opinions about this?
About scanners, I'm still hanging in with my old CanoScan D 1230U. I can only print up to 8X10 so maybe I would want a different scanner if I had a larger printer, or sent files out for printing. (I do both medium format and 35mm slides and negatives, and of course scan a lot of documents for OCR, and pictures for reproduction. Seems to meet my needs) What am I missing?
Don Williams La Jolla, CA
- [rollei_list] Re: Jeffery PAW - Week 30
- From: Carlos Manuel Freaza
- [rollei_list] Scanner advice needed, please
- From: Craig Roberts
- [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- From: David Dodge
- [rollei_list] Re: Scanner advice needed, please
- From: Don Williams