[rollei_list] Re: [!! SPAM] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Walker Smith <doubs43@xxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 16:44:41 -0500
Hi Eric,
Thanks for the reply. I agree that each of us have our own preferred
method of working. What one considers important may not be to another.
When I first read about your friend I thought that perhaps he knew
something I didn't that could be helpful.
The scanners being discussed are largely beyond my budget and I use a
lowly Epson 4180 for my 6x6 negatives. I use Vuescan and like it when
compared to the maker's software. I'm in the process of scanning tens of
thousands of my late father's negatives. At the moment I'm doing
Rolleicord and Rolleiflex negatives that were taken in the 1940's and
early 1950's. Here's a link to one taken with the 'Cord in 1950 by
window light as my grandfather worked in his mill. Eventually I'll have
this made into a couple of 8x10 prints for family members.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2108/2116012520_86b6eee4f8_o.jpg
It's not, I'm sure up to the quality that some of the discussed scanners
are capable of but I think I could take it to 11x14 without too much
trouble and it would still look OK.
Walker Smith
Eric Goldstein wrote:
Hi Walker -
It is not of over-riding importance to me, but it is to him and some
others. This limitation of VueScan is often discussed. Each has their
work-flow preferences; he hates having to take the extra step of
importing RAW indirectly. He finds ViewScan (and the
Polaroid/Mictrotek) slow; others feel VueScan gives a lot of image
control and don't mind the wait...
Eric Goldstein
--
On 12/24/07, Walker Smith <doubs43@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Why is scanning directly into Photoshop of overriding importance? I
prefer to scan to a folder and then open the file in whatever program I
choose to work with. What am I missing as far as scanning directly into
Photoshop goes?
Walker
Eric Goldstein wrote:
It is slow, and he is no fan of ViewScan, as this does
not allow you to scan directly into Photoshop,
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- Follow-Ups:
- [rollei_list] Re: [!! SPAM] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Eric Goldstein
- References:
- [rollei_list] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] Re: [!! SPAM] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Walker Smith
- [rollei_list] Re: [!! SPAM] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Eric Goldstein
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] Re: [!! SPAM] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: [!! SPAM] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: [!! SPAM] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: [!! SPAM] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
Hi Walker - It is not of over-riding importance to me, but it is to him and some others. This limitation of VueScan is often discussed. Each has their work-flow preferences; he hates having to take the extra step of importing RAW indirectly. He finds ViewScan (and the Polaroid/Mictrotek) slow; others feel VueScan gives a lot of image control and don't mind the wait... Eric Goldstein -- On 12/24/07, Walker Smith <doubs43@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Why is scanning directly into Photoshop of overriding importance? I prefer to scan to a folder and then open the file in whatever program I choose to work with. What am I missing as far as scanning directly into Photoshop goes? Walker Eric Goldstein wrote:It is slow, and he is no fan of ViewScan, as this does not allow you to scan directly into Photoshop,
--- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- [rollei_list] Re: [!! SPAM] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] Re: [!! SPAM] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Walker Smith
- [rollei_list] Re: [!! SPAM] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Eric Goldstein