[rollei_list] Re: [!! SPAM] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Walker Smith <doubs43@xxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 23:04:18 -0500
Why is scanning directly into Photoshop of overriding importance? I
prefer to scan to a folder and then open the file in whatever program I
choose to work with. What am I missing as far as scanning directly into
Photoshop goes?
Walker
Eric Goldstein wrote:
It is slow, and he is no fan of ViewScan, as this does
not allow you to scan directly into Photoshop,
Eric Goldstein
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- Follow-Ups:
- [rollei_list] Re: [!! SPAM] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Eric Goldstein
- References:
- [rollei_list] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Eric Goldstein
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] Re: [!! SPAM] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: [!! SPAM] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: [!! SPAM] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: [!! SPAM] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
It is slow, and he is no fan of ViewScan, as this doesnot allow you to scan directly into Photoshop,
Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] Re: [!! SPAM] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Eric Goldstein