[rollei_list] Re: S2 format
- From: "Marvin Wallace" <Marvin0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 07:20:24 +0800
Marvin Wallace
One of the motivations for getting the "correct" ratio, is that if you
continually change cameras (like me), you end up with a catalogue of work
that doesn't fit together very well. You perhaps will have beautiful 6 X 6
portraits and then 2.4 x 3.6 portraits done with a nice lens such as a
summicron 90.
Though I have been unable to live up to my own ideal, it is good to use as
few cameras as possible, so I would argue against the many ratio's are good
hypothesis.
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- Follow-Ups:
- [rollei_list] Re: S2 format
- From: Gene Johnson
- References:
- [rollei_list] Re: S2 format
- From: Eric Goldstein
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] S2 format
- » [rollei_list] Re: S2 format
- » [rollei_list] Re: S2 format
- » [rollei_list] Re: S2 format
- » [rollei_list] Re: S2 format
- » [rollei_list] Re: S2 format
- » [rollei_list] Re: S2 format
- » [rollei_list] Re: S2 format
- » [rollei_list] Re: S2 format
- » [rollei_list] Re: S2 format
- » [rollei_list] Re: S2 format
- » [rollei_list] Re: S2 format
- » [rollei_list] Re: S2 format
- » [rollei_list] Re: S2 format
- [rollei_list] Re: S2 format
- From: Gene Johnson
- [rollei_list] Re: S2 format
- From: Eric Goldstein