Hi Stephen -
As I've mentioned in a previous post, I have had perspective problems
while using the #2... guess it depends on the circumstances and
demands of the user...
Eric Goldstein
--
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Stephen Attaway
<stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The difference between the viewing and taking lenses is one reason the
'3'
is too much. I've never worried about that with the '2': at 1/2 meter
the
rolleipar is still adequate.
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Eric Goldstein" <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2010 8:06 AM
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Rolleinar 3 poll
Hi Carlos -
I sure see your point... if you want to shoot close up hand held, a
ground glass and extension tubes are not really a good play. The
Rolleinars make this possible. There are going to be times when the
difference between viewing and taking lenses create some unwanted
surprises, but obviously from the way you describe this shot, not
always...
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the
subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in
the
subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
