[rollei_list] Re: Rolleinar 3 poll
- From: Eric Goldstein <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 09:45:53 -0500
Hi Carlos -
If I go this route, my Koni-Omegaflex is a better choice. It uses
extension tubes instead of diopters, a GG that is more accurately
positioned in the film channel than most, and a couple of nice
magnifying hoods which greatly help in viewing. I get better
flexibility and performance and on 67.
Eric Goldstein
--
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 8:50 AM, CarlosMFreaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If you use the film sheet adapter is not a serious problem, BTW it
> requires a tripod and to use film sheet (I still have several Efke 25
> sheets), you can use the GG insert to frame the picture and the GG
> viewfinder for fine focusing, the film plane GG could be difficult to
> use for it if the external light is strong, you'd need a black fabric
> to watch the film plane GG for fine focusing.
>
> I have seen a beautiful yellow rose photograph taken camera handheld
> with the 2.8 GX and a Rolleinar 3 in the last Rollei Club magazin, the
> focusing distance is so short that you could calculate the difference
> for viewing and taking lens in your mind with a bit of practice, the
> viewing lens Heidosmat- Rolleipar helps.
>
> Carlos
>
> 2010/3/6 Eric Goldstein <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> I have found the difference in perspective significant with a #2. Your
>> suggestion to compose on a GG is a good if cumbersome solution.
>> Repositioning the taking lens into the viewing lens position is
>> equally a PIA...
>>
>>
>> Eric Goldstein
>>
>> --
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Hi Carlos, I have the bay111 #3. As well as the 1 and 2. When you are
>>>> focusing that close, the perspective difference between taking lens and
>>>> viewing lens is significant. It is a good reason to use the sheet film
>>>> back
>>>> so that you can see what the taking lens is seeing. Otherwise you just
>>>> must
>>>> keep in mind the difference and move your point of view a little higher
>>>> than
>>>> it seems in the camera.
>>>> This is a portrait taken with the number 3:
>>>> http://dennispurdy.com/Portraits/Jake%20with%20smile.html
>>>>
>>>> Dennis
>> ---
>> Rollei List
>>
>> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
>> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>>
>> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
>> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>>
>> - Online, searchable archives are available at
>> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>>
>>
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
>
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
