[rollei_list] Re: Rolleiflex 2.8E value

  • From: "Stephen Attaway" <attaway@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:16:10 -0700

Wow, the production numbers for the 'f' series are
very impressive. 235,000 'f's vs 86,000 'e's. Thats a lot
of classic cameras.

n Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:48:17 +0000 (GMT)
 Carlos Manuel Freaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Coinciding with the production numbers, the 3.5F was
> the best seller model and this condition was the
> reason the original Carl Zeiss Mutar lenses design was
> optimal for the 3.5/75 six elements Planar (Report II,
> page 24-502) on March 1963.-
> 
> All the best 
> Carlos  
>  --- Marc James Small <msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx> escribió:
> 
> > At 11:29 AM 8/23/2006 -0700, Stephen Attaway wrote:
> > 
> > >I suspect many more 'e's were sold than all the
> > follow on
> > >'f's and 't's combined. Thats true of the M3/M2 vs
> > later
> > >Leicas, because of the Nikon F.
> > >
> > >Anyone have sales figures?
> > 
> > Here are the factory production figures:
> > 
> > 2.8A                    9,870
> > 2.8B                    1,250
> > 2.8C                  30,150
> > 2.8D                  20,100
> > 2.8E                  44,000
> > 2.8F                  82,800
> > 2.8E2                   7,000
> > 2.8E3                   2,025
> > 
> > 3.5C/E                43,000
> > 3.5F (1)      20,000
> > 3.5F (2)      11,500
> > 3.5F (3)    121,000
> > 3.5E2 (1)       2,000
> > 3.5E (2)        2,000
> > 3.5E3                   5,035
> > 
> > Rolleiflex T          99,000
> > 
> > I realize that sales figures might be lower than
> > production numbers, but I
> > doubt if the differences would be great -- who has
> > ever heard of basements
> > full of unsold Rolleiflex TLR cameras in the
> > basement?
> > 
> > Marc
> > 
> > 
> > msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir!
> > 
> > ---
> > Rollei List
> > 
> > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > with 'subscribe'
> > in the subject field OR by logging into
> > www.freelists.org
> > 
> > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > with
> > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging
> > into www.freelists.org
> > 
> > - Online, searchable archives are available at
> > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>       
>       
>               
> __________________________________________________
> Preguntá. Respondé. Descubrí.
> Todo lo que querías saber, y lo que ni imaginabas,
> está en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta).
> ¡Probalo ya! 
> http://www.yahoo.com.ar/respuestas
> 
> ---
> Rollei List
> 
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'subscribe' 
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
> 
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into
> www.freelists.org
> 
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> 

---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' 
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: