[rollei_list] Re: Rolleiflex 2.8C Xenotar, Pan F 50
----- Original Message ----- From: "Carlos Manuel Freaza" <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 6:09 PM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Rolleiflex 2.8C Xenotar, Pan F 50



Hi Austin:
I rescanned the neg and worked with tonal curves, I think the image improved for the shadows details,however as the image titles says, it's a "high contrast" photograph, the digital image from the scanner can't handle some tones transitions very well and then they look "steep". I had uploaded the image as I obtained it from the scanner and it was an error, it's noticeable the improvement for the shadows details working with the curves and the tonal curves "steep" appearance did not disappear but it improved too. Thank you very much for your opinion Austin, I replaced the image and this is the rescanned image (better seen at the largest size): 

http://www.flickr.com/photos/itarfoto/3382094261/

Carlos
I missed the original version. This looks fine to me, excellent mid gray rendition and I don't see anything missing in either highlights or shadows. 

--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org 

- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: