[rollei_list] Re: [Rollei] Re: shutter issues & further ramblings on digital
- From: Peter J Nebergall <iusar4s@xxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:25:11 -0600
suspect maybe your immediate environment is putting dust in your
shutters? When I was doing a lot of archaeology the R-cord was
frequently off to the camera doctor -- & cla jobs that last the longest
are followed by best possible storage/use environment. Mine, dust/mud +
cold of aerial photo is not so good.
Peter Nebergall
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:31:56 EST FSilberman@xxxxxxx writes:
> You wrote in part:
>
>
> > So, as far as time interval, its not possible to come up
> > with an exact number because there are so many variables. My
> > Rolleiflex 2.8E was serviced by Harry Fleenor about ten
> > years ago and the shutter is still right on the nose.
> > Several shutters I've done myself also have not seemed to
> > vary over a very long time.
> >
>
> Thanks for the detailed reply. I suspected possibly my shutter has a
> short
> calibration life, maybe I'll ask the tech to look at it more
> carefully the next
> time around. For what it's worth, I did send it out to Harry Fleenor
> one time
> for shutter servicing, as well as using my own local guy. The
> service cycle
> remained relatively constant. It slow speeds begin sticking
> regardless after a
> certain interval usually around 3 years.
>
> I do use it commercially, maybe I should consider a digital shutter
> tester.
> When the slow speeds stick thought is pretty quickly apparent. I
> tend to use
> the Rollei more for B&W work & with color neg. material (which I
> print & get
> drum scanned for pre press work) so the latitude covers minor
> shutter
> inconsistencies. Unfortunately or fortunately I've been shifting
> over to digital. I have
> to say I much prefer the workflow of film & the look also, but it
> seems at
> least for commercial work a necessity for survival & not fall
> behind. It's a wave
> you need to ride. I called my pro lab the other day as I did not
> like the
> look of the prints from my 6x7 negs, I suspected they were digital
> output & yes
> he answered all film is now scanned & printed. The prints look
> sharper, but
> also much less smooth & not as nice overall. Disappointing. I think
> I'll go back
> to chromes now over color negs.
>
> Best,
>
> Frédéric
>
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts: