[rollei_list] Re: Rollei 35S, SE

Eric,

I have used at least two cameras with the 47mm f2.0 Ektar. The Kodak Bantam Special and the Kardon.

Both produced slides that were sensational.

Jerry


Eric Goldstein wrote:
That's a nice machine, but ever shoot the version of this with the
47/2 Ektar? It will make your mouth water...


Eric Goldstein

--

On 9/30/07, Peter J Nebergall <iusar4s@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
To me the real competitor is my Retina II with rangefinder, 50mm Xenon
f2...  nice mavhine, and it looks so "quaint" to "moderns" that I can get
damn near any portrait I want with it.  Half my HARD CORE punk portraits
aredone with it...

Peter Nebergall
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:11:10 -0400 Marc James Small
<marcsmall@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
At 07:38 PM 9/30/2007, marvin0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
 >In my opinion the Rollei 35 is a dog, it is akward and
cumbersome.
 >Please note that they can only be realistically used with the
lens
 >closed down focused at distance. I have never seen one used with
 >focusing other that stopped down.
 >A much better camera for the size in my opinion is a Leica M, or
a
 >Petri 35 colour.

Thank you for your opinion.  I love my Rollei 35S
and often shoot it wide-open, though I do
acknowledge that it works better when I am stone
sober rather than drunk, what with the zone focusing and all.

The Petri 35 line are interesting but are hardly
in the same league.  Now, the real competitor to
the Rollei 35S is the Werra III.  Light, small,
neat, and cool.  And the three lenses are optical killers, as well.

Marc


msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir!


---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: