[rollei_list] Re: Rollei 3.5 MX - EVS, type 2

• From: Sacsu@xxxxxxx
• To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:20:41 EDT

Marc, the taking lens is not a Zeiss. It's Schneider - Kreuznach Xenar. Does 
this make meaningful in difference in picture quality?

 It's not my intention to restart the lingering debate/discussion over lens 
type and ensuing picture quality!

Thanks,

Sam

• Follow-Ups:
  • [rollei_list] Re: Rollei 3.5 MX - EVS, type 2
    • From: hoarcroft
  • [rollei_list] Re: Rollei 3.5 MX - EVS, type 2
    • From: Marc James Small

Other related posts:

• » [rollei_list] Rollei 3.5 MX - EVS, type 2
• » [rollei_list] Re: Rollei 3.5 MX - EVS, type 2
• » [rollei_list] Re: Rollei 3.5 MX - EVS, type 2
• » [rollei_list] Re: Rollei 3.5 MX - EVS, type 2
• » [rollei_list] Re: Rollei 3.5 MX - EVS, type 2
• » [rollei_list] Re: Rollei 3.5 MX - EVS, type 2
• » [rollei_list] Re: Rollei 3.5 MX - EVS, type 2
• » [rollei_list] Re: Rollei 3.5 MX - EVS, type 2
• » [rollei_list] Re: Rollei 3.5 MX - EVS, type 2
• » [rollei_list] Rollei 3.5 MX - EVS, type 2
• » [rollei_list] Re: Rollei 3.5 MX - EVS, type 2
• » [rollei_list] Re: Rollei 3.5 MX - EVS, type 2
• » [rollei_list] Re: Rollei 3.5 MX - EVS, type 2
• » [rollei_list] Re: Rollei 3.5 MX - EVS, type 2
• » [rollei_list] Rollei 3.5 MX - EVS, type 2
• » [rollei_list] Re: Rollei 3.5 MX - EVS, type 2
• » [rollei_list] Re: Rollei 3.5 MX - EVS, type 2
• » [rollei_list] Re: Rollei 3.5 MX - EVS, type 2

• » Related posts
• » Previous by Date
• » Next by Date
• » This Month's Archive
• » Main Archive Page

• » View list details
• » Manage your subscription