[rollei_list] Re: Rodinal & Neopan results
- From: Robert Lilley <54moggie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:50:09 -0400
Very nice the both of you! The texture in Albany Roof Garden is
fantastic! Nothing like the acutance of Rodinal! I use it for
'gritty detail' and have good results with Efke 100. But, Jan, I
don't think this combination would ever be as soft as your great shot
"Enjoying Fall" - thats another thing entirely.
Rob
On Mar 24, 2009, at 11:08 AM, Richard Sintchak wrote:
Jan,
I think your tones look fantastic! Yes, a bit contrasty but that's
more than conditions I think and not adjusting for such. Should you
decide to try this combination again and find yourself in such
contrast I recommend shooting the Neopan 400 at 250 and pulling back
your development time about 30%. Should make for a flatter neg but
will scan much easier and you'll get more detail in the shadows.
I have had some great results with Neopan 400 with Rodinal:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rich8155/2586707363/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rich8155/67533121/
(though neither of those were the over-expose/pull back development
time method for contrasty light, and just the first one is a Rollei
shot....)
--
Richard S.
San Francisco
My Photography Website
http://www.lightshadowandtone.com
My Flickr River
http://flickriver.com/photos/rich8155/popular-interesting/
My Commute Photo Blog
http://shootingonthefly.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Jan Decher <Jan.Decher@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This "Donkeys in WIlliston, VT" series are the first three results
from the
roll of Neopan 400 I processed in my "old" Rodinal 1:50 for 11
minutes (as
recommended on the Rodinal box and the "Massive Development Chart"):
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mittelformat/
It got a bit too contrasty for my taste so I struggled a bit to
make it work
in the digital environment and I know the negs won't be a pleasure
to work
with in the darkroom. Perhaps the developer was a tad too cold
(1/2 a
degree Celsius) ??
Two pictures ot the Montreal olympic tower against the blue sky are
worthless becasue the sky and tower ended up almost white in white
(on this
note: I am looking for a clean Bay II orange filter!)
I may go back to Sprint Developer or D76 for Neopan 400.
Definitely need a
softer result for "Mother and baby" shoot I have planned with my
3.5E.
Any suggestions?
Jan
On Mar 24, 2009, at 1:07 AM, FreeLists Mailing List Manager wrote:
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:35:28 -0700
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Rodinal Question
From: Richard Sintchak <rich815@xxxxxxxxx>
I've used 5+ year old stuff that was not brown, but BLACK. Worked
fine.
--
Richard S.
San Francisco
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into
www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts: