[rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it ! not nonsenss
- From: "Ruben" <ruben@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 22:25:56 +0200
I do not use a tripod ! Peter - so it is not nonsense - i have tried with
EOS - Nikons etc. and I miss some of my target - I do not with the M !
I do not need to move away from my Rolleiflex as it is at breast/belly hight
and I full eye to ey contact using that - all the best Ruben
ps. do not mind going back to Rolleis - just added a 3,5 MX-EVS type II to
my bag - I have to pick it up in the other end of the country ( very small
country that is - Denmark :-) ) but is was just 100 usd so I am happy as a
(is it lark ??)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter K." <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 6:57 PM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
> Ruben,
>
> That is utter nonsense. I do the same with my EOS. I have the camera
> on a tripod, adjust the framing, and the use a cable release to take
> images as I talk with the subject. Very simple. You can do this with
> ANY camera.
> The see more issue, well that is arguable but I would rather not take
> this further.
> Time to go back to Rolleis.=20
>
> Peter K
>
>
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:20:40 +0200, Ruben <ruben@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I have found one thing that i can do with leica M that I am not able to
>> d=
> o
>> with SLRs (canon eos)
>> When i shoot a portrait I sometimes feel that it is important to have
>> ful=
> l
>> eye contact with the subject.
>> After adjusting distansce and framing I can move a way for the Leica M
>> viewfinder and look directly at the person without the camera moving and
>> while gette a stranong eye - to ye contact iI can press the shutter - So
>> =
> far
>> I have not missed a frame! The method is very good with Children as you
>> c=
> an
>> get them to ignore the camera and act more naturally. The second thing I
>> love with my leicas is that I can see more than what gets on the
>> picturer=
> -
>> shooting SLR is like a racinghorse with "Blinds"
>> imho - fyi - etc and a :-) - ruben
>>=20
>>=20
>
>
> --=20
> Peter K
> =D3=BF=D5=AC
>
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [rollei_list] OT / prove it !
- From: Fred Fichter
- [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- From: Allen Zak
- [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- From: Fred Fichter
- [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- From: Ruben
- [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- From: Peter K.
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it ! not nonsenss
- [rollei_list] OT / prove it !
- From: Fred Fichter
- [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- From: Allen Zak
- [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- From: Fred Fichter
- [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- From: Ruben
- [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- From: Peter K.