[rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 18:18:21 -0800
Peter.
Is Peter K=20 your name? It is coming over on the ORIGINAL
message.
Jerry
"Peter K." wrote:
> I think what you are saying is that there are a great resolution of
> lpmm in a smaller format. However, when you enlarge you lose. Or if
> you were to drop a smaller portion of the 120 negative you to 35mm
> size you would not have as sharp a image from it as an entire 35mm
> negative. Correct?
>
> Peter K=20
>
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 19:23:01 -0500, Austin Franklin <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> w=
> rote:
> > Hi Eric,
> >=20
> > > If you want real shgarpness at enlargement, you don't shoot 35 mm...
> >=20
> > I don't follow you. 35mm is typically sharper than larger formats, per
> > square area of negative space.
> >=20
> > Regards,
> >=20
> > Austin
> >=20
> >=20
>
> --=20
> Peter K
> =D3=BF=D5=AC
Other related posts:
