[rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- From: "Peter K." <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:29:10 -0800
I think what you are saying is that there are a great resolution of
lpmm in a smaller format. However, when you enlarge you lose. Or if
you were to drop a smaller portion of the 120 negative you to 35mm
size you would not have as sharp a image from it as an entire 35mm
negative. Correct?
Peter K=20
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 19:23:01 -0500, Austin Franklin <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> w=
rote:
> Hi Eric,
>=20
> > If you want real shgarpness at enlargement, you don't shoot 35 mm...
>=20
> I don't follow you. 35mm is typically sharper than larger formats, per
> square area of negative space.
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> Austin
>=20
>=20
--=20
Peter K
=D3=BF=D5=AC
- Follow-Ups:
- [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- From: Jerry Lehrer
- References:
- [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- From: Austin Franklin
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- From: Jerry Lehrer
- [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- From: Austin Franklin