[rollei_list] Re: OT - The 1967 Indy 500 and the turbine-powered car in it
- From: Ardeshir Mehta <ardeshir@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 21:44:15 -0500
On Saturday, January 29, 2005, at 01:35 AM, Frank Dernie wrote:
> There was much interest generated by the turbine car at Indy but as
> you say it is only mildly suitable for oval racing and even then not
> convincingly.
>
> Frank
This does not sound correct given what has been said about this race.
The turbine powered car driven by Parnelli Jones at Indy was almost a
whole LAP ahead of AJ Foyt, the next driver, till almost the end of the
race, when a bearing in the gear casing failed - nothing to do with the
turbine, please note. I don't know how much more convincing it can get,
than to be almost a lap ahead.
- Follow-Ups:
- [rollei_list] Re: OT - The 1967 Indy 500 and the turbine-powered car in it
- From: David Seifert
- [rollei_list] Re: OT - The 1967 Indy 500
- From: Bernard
- References:
- [rollei_list] Re: OT - Formula One and Perpetual Motion
- From: Frank Dernie
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT - The 1967 Indy 500 and the turbine-powered car in it
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT - The 1967 Indy 500 and the turbine-powered car in it
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT - The 1967 Indy 500 and the turbine-powered car in it
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT - The 1967 Indy 500 and the turbine-powered car in it
- [rollei_list] Re: OT - The 1967 Indy 500 and the turbine-powered car in it
- From: David Seifert
- [rollei_list] Re: OT - The 1967 Indy 500
- From: Bernard
- [rollei_list] Re: OT - Formula One and Perpetual Motion
- From: Frank Dernie