[rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:46:36 -0800
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter K." <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2007 3:46 PM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
Thanks Richard. My error. I did notice Portra BW was
disco'd. Glad to see
there are still some films that remain. 2007 has surely been
the year of
digital. I hope film sticks around a while longer.
So do I. There is evidently still a pretty large market
for "conventional" photographic products, just not the
enormous market there was until digital began to erode it.
The problem is that the larger companies, like Kodak, Agfa,
Fuji, and Ilford, have technology which the small, mostly
formerly eastern european, companies do not have and are not
likely ever to develop. This makes more difference to film
than paper but results in both products being behind the
times and in rather poor quality control.
Fuji makes good B&W printing paper but sells it only in
Japan. I don't know why they are not interested in a larger
market but there may be good business reasons that are not
obvious.
There have been other transistions in technology
historically that are somewhat comparable, for instance the
supplanting of vacuum tubes by transistors and the
supplanting of steam locomotives by diesel-electric. In the
U.S. some vacuum tube manufacturers managed to make the
transision but others died out and none of the three makers
of main-line steam locomotives survived.
Agfa was already in other businesses so it simply dropped
out of making chemical photographic products. Kodak, I
think, would have like to do so but its main product line
was chemical photography. Ilford has managed to hold on
perhaps because they are a much smaller company and more
flexible. Fuji is also in many other businesses and it
appears they have managed to continue to find photographic
products sufficiently profitable to keep on with them.
Digital is not going to go away but, one hopes, neither
will chemical photography.
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- References:
- [rollei_list] OT: Slide Film and E6
- From: ERoustom
- [rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
- From: Peter K.
- [rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
- From: Peter K.
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] OT: Slide Film and E6
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
- [rollei_list] OT: Slide Film and E6
- From: ERoustom
- [rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
- From: Peter K.
- [rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [rollei_list] Re: OT: Slide Film and E6
- From: Peter K.