[rollei_list] Re: OT Seal Dry Mount Press
- From: Douglas Nygren <dnygr@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:41:38 -0400
Yes. I agree, IMHO, that photos for galleries are best hung on
mattboard rather than dry mounted. It allows for more flexibility. I
also agree that these days "most dry mounting and laminating is for
other purposes than gallery sales." But these are just opinions.
I've changed how I mount photos. I no longer dry mount, though I have
the press and materials still.
Doug
On Jul 9, 2009, at 4:06 AM, Richard Knoppow wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Douglas Nygren" <dnygr@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 6:19 PM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: OT Seal Dry Mount Press
What happened to Seal? The advent of digital, the Great Recession?
What?
It would seem Seal would be impervious to the digital age. Maybe I
don't understand digital paper.
Doug
I couldn't find much with a casual web search. Seal sold out to
Hunt-Bienfang probably fifteen or more years ago. I was unable to find
out why. I don't buy the idea that they lost a lot of business because
gallery types don't like dry mounting. My guess is that most dry
mounting and laminating is for other purposes than gallery sales. Dry
mounting is very permanent and provides a substantial amount of
protection to photographic images. The reason gallery owners don't
like it is that its _too_ permanent and it is difficult to remove dry
mounted prints from their mountings if any work must be done on them
or if the mounting must be replaced. Some newer materials are
removable fairly easily by reheating the press but most of the older
tissues are very difficult to remove.
Whatever the reason IMO dry mounting is the best looking mount for
display purposes. However, even if one wants to use hinge mounting for
fiber prints the best method of getting them flat is to dry them in a
dry mount press. This flattening process is part of the normal dry
mounting procedure and is surprisingly permanent. It works at low heat
so does not damage the emulsion. It is not necessary to flatten RC
prints. Low temperature mounting material has been available for many
years. Originally it was intended for color prints but gradually
became the standard and, of course, worked well for B&W RC paper.
The presses and materials made by Bienfang appear to be very
similar to the old Seal line, however Light Impressions also makes
presses and mounting materials. Their presses are also similar to the
Seal line. I have no idea of how two companies got such similar
designs although the Seal patents, if any, must have expired years
ago.
I have written a procedure for dry mounting which includes the
flattening process which can be used alone. This was posted to several
Usenet groups in the past and is probably still available. I also have
the Seal handbook for dry mounting (if I can find it). Since I've
acquired a scanner since the last time I had it in hand I think its
time to scan it and find someone who will put it on their web site.
The Seal method is different in several respects from the Kodak dry
mounting method which is found in both Kodak literature and in a
number of photography handbooks of the 1950s vintage. The Kodak
method, which begins with drawing an X through the center of the print
with the tacking iron is guaranteed to produce wrinkles and other
unevenness. The Seal method OTOH, will produce perfectly flat prints
with no edge leakage or other problems every time and is pretty easy
to do.
For archival purposes (if you want to store prints for a century
or so) its just as well to dark store them and never display them. If
the principle purpose of a print is to be displayed then the
appearance becomes important and takes precedence (IMO) over ideal
archival storage.
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in
the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts: