[rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Jim Brick <jim@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 23:28:03 -0800
At 08:26 PM 12/24/2007 -0500, Eric Goldstein wrote:
ViewScan, as this does
not allow you to scan directly into Photoshop,
It will scan to RAW (.dng), which is read in directly by PS. That's
what I do. Actually, I mostly use LightRoom. LightRoom also reads-in
the RAW files created by Vue Scan. Vue Scan RAW files are the RAW
output from the scanner hardware and therefore can be fully
manipulated by PS or LR. It's like RAW from a camera. LR was built
specifically for RAW, therefore, LR and my Vue Scan RAW files get
along perfectly.
I use a Rollei for 80% of my photography, my Linhof Technikardan 45S
for the other 20%. I scan probably 40% of my Rollei images, maybe 10%
of my LF images. I actually print them in my darkroom (Ciba's) and
scan them when I want to print larger than 20x20 / 20x24. I have a
local lab with a LightJet printer, and one with a Chromira printer.
They both produce the same quality work.
I have several Hasselblads. The flagship models. 205FCC, 203FE,
903SWC, FlexBody, and lenses galore. But I find that my old Rollei
SL66 does more for me than any of the Hasselblads (save the SWC). The
majority of my best 6x6 images were taken with my Rollei. I have come
to the conclusion that it's not how advanced one's hardware is, it is
how the hardware performs for the user thereof.
I am not arguing with anyone, just stating my facts. I use and really
like my Microtek 120tf scanner. It competes equally with my
colleagues Nikon 8000. It probably is old technology (as is my SL66)
but it is definitely possible that, since it is still being
manufactured, upgrades have been introduced over the years. I
personally do not care if they have or have not. Mine simply works.
It typically produces 525MB .dng (Digital NeGative) files, which are
basically the same as camera RAW files. 525MB files are a whopping
lot of data! and I can say without reservation, they are able to
produce razor sharp prints as large as a LightJet printer can print,
that is, 50"x50" (keeping it square).
Someone asked about a MF scanner $1500 or less. I'm simply answering
that question relating my personal experiences.
:-)
Jim
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- Follow-Ups:
- [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Frederic Vanwalleghem
- References:
- [rollei_list] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Eric Goldstein
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
ViewScan, as this does not allow you to scan directly into Photoshop,
- [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Frederic Vanwalleghem
- [rollei_list] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Eric Goldstein