[rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Robert Lilley <54moggie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:54:56 -0500
I scan 4x5 negs using an Epson V750 - even though I can scan B&W 'wet'
to eliminate dust spots, etc, I don't bother cause its easier to clean
up the one or two spots in Photoshop or Lightroom that may get through
the process. I really can't say I have problems with dust and do
basically what the others do - just make sure glass and negs are clean.
Rob
On Dec 30, 2007, at 9:47 PM, David Dodge wrote:
I have an Epson 4990 that I use for everything but 35mm.
I find what works best is to lay the negative face down on the glass
an then lay a piece of no glare glass on top of it, etched side
down. Then I close the lid and scan with the "Film (with film area
guide)" This eliminates negative pop and Newton's rings.
There are 4 glass surfaces that can pick up dust. But if I Windex
everything, I get most of it, except what ever is on the film. Most
of these yield to the polonium magic brush and a quick squirt of
canned air. I'm not very meticulous as I can easily spot out any
that persist with the clone tool.
party on
David
Scanning a slide/negative on an embedded printer (like a Nikon
where you
insert the framed slides/negatives) should give less dust/better
results, or
am I wrong?
Kind regards
Frederic
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in
the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- References:
- [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Neil Gould
- [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Frederic Vanwalleghem
- [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Peter K.
- [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: David Dodge
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
I have an Epson 4990 that I use for everything but 35mm.I find what works best is to lay the negative face down on the glass an then lay a piece of no glare glass on top of it, etched side down. Then I close the lid and scan with the "Film (with film area guide)" This eliminates negative pop and Newton's rings.
There are 4 glass surfaces that can pick up dust. But if I Windex everything, I get most of it, except what ever is on the film. Most of these yield to the polonium magic brush and a quick squirt of canned air. I'm not very meticulous as I can easily spot out any that persist with the clone tool.
party on David
Scanning a slide/negative on an embedded printer (like a Nikon where you insert the framed slides/negatives) should give less dust/better results, or am I wrong? Kind regards Frederic
--- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Neil Gould
- [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Frederic Vanwalleghem
- [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Peter K.
- [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: David Dodge