[rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: David Dodge <dannysoar@xxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:47:46 -0500
I have an Epson 4990 that I use for everything but 35mm.
I find what works best is to lay the negative face down on the glass an
then lay a piece of no glare glass on top of it, etched side down. Then
I close the lid and scan with the "Film (with film area guide)" This
eliminates negative pop and Newton's rings.
There are 4 glass surfaces that can pick up dust. But if I Windex
everything, I get most of it, except what ever is on the film. Most of
these yield to the polonium magic brush and a quick squirt of canned
air. I'm not very meticulous as I can easily spot out any that persist
with the clone tool.
party on
David
Scanning a slide/negative on an embedded printer (like a Nikon
where you
insert the framed slides/negatives) should give less dust/better
results, or
am I wrong?
Kind regards
Frederic
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- Follow-Ups:
- [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Robert Lilley
- References:
- [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Neil Gould
- [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Frederic Vanwalleghem
- [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Peter K.
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
Scanning a slide/negative on an embedded printer (like a Nikon
where you
insert the framed slides/negatives) should give less dust/better
results, or
am I wrong?
Kind regards
Frederic
- [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Robert Lilley
- [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Neil Gould
- [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Frederic Vanwalleghem
- [rollei_list] Re: OT Re: Scanning 120 film
- From: Peter K.