On Saturday, January 29, 2005, at 08:43 PM, Richard Knoppow wrote: > I think the main problem with current release is the sheer numbers of > prints that are usually made, on the order of 2000 for many movies. > > Certainly improved projection mechanisms would be very helpful but > they won't make any difference if the print itself is bad. Very true. But what Ebert and others have said about the great improvement of Maxivision 48 over standard 35mm projection leads me to think that this really IS a great improvement. It also stands to reason, doesn't it, if each successive frame is projected at a precisely registered spot on the screen. That said, however, I have to confess I have never personally seen Maxivision 48 in action. Have you? Has anyone? I'd really like to know. Even better, to sample it. Cheers.