[rollei_list] Re: OT: Kodak Film Formats
- From: Marc James Small <marcsmall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 08:39:17 -0400
At 03:27 AM 7/19/2010, you wrote:
>
>Looks like I'm not alone in thinking this, and I'd call it the
>Conventional Wisdom on the subject.
Again, David, you are entitled to reside in your
own version of la-la-land. I will stay with what
has been set out since 1963, that 126 was just an
update of 828. Frankly, nothing else makes
sense. 127 was dead in sales by 1955, and 828,
as well. Kodak had no reason to kill off 127 and
they had every reason to upgrade 135.
I am not interested in sales hype from
Kodak. Get me an article from Herb Keppler
saying that 126 was aimed only at the destruction
of 135. THAT would carry some weight.
Again, we will do best just to agree to disagree.
Marc
msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir!
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
