Cogratulations on a great buy! Looking forward to seeing some LF scans in the not so distant future... :-) Thor On 26 Mar, 2008, at 23:15, Jeff Kelley wrote:
I'm about to find out myself about 4x5 surge marks.The Sinar turned out to be better than described. I was sold as soon as the case opened. The only thing in the case that looks like it has been used is the Polaroid film holder, the camera, lenses and accessories look pristine. The seller bought it all new in the '80s & estimates he made about 100 exposures with it. It has been in storage for years...but I liberated it about an hour ago.Jeff On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Jim Brick <jim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: You can get surge marks if you don't do it correctly, but you can get a plethora of anomalies with ANY processing method if done incorrectly. But it is just so simple with hangers in a tank. :-) Jim On Mar 26, 2008, at 2:14 PM, Jerry Laderberg wrote: > The old complaint re that method was about the " surge" marks. --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org- Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
--- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list