[rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- From: "Marvin Wallace" <Marvin0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:50:18 -0700
Hi,
I use a Sigma SD9 with the standard 28-70mm sigma lens. The build quality of
the lenses is pretty plasticky.
I shoot often with the M42 mount, with lenses such as the Pentax 1.4 50mm.
This has been great for me, as it has convinced me that there is no need
whatsever to upgrade my digital equipment.
Quite honestly it all looks the same, unlike a Rollei with a fine black and
white film.
Marvin.
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- References:
- [rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- From: Michael Eric Berube
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] OT: A Better Bayer?
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- [rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- From: Michael Eric Berube