[rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?

Yep. No argument. Some are dogs and I don't believe that their QC is quite up to the standards of some of the Camera companies either, but when you find a good example of some of their better lenses (EX line is almost all fantastic) you've got a great tool. I use an 18-50/2.8, a 50-150/2.8 and I rented a 10-20/4-5.6 for a wedding this last weekend and was very impressed and will very likely get one. Their new 70/2.8 Macro is getting rave reviews as one of the sharpest Macros ever made. Again, they already make some 4:3 lenses, they'd be brilliant to make a camera that took those lenses but used their Foveon tech. 

(I don't think they make lenses in Rollei mount though.)
:)

Be well,
Michael Eric Berube




Eric Goldstein wrote:

Some Sigma lenses are notoriously horrible. The original 400/5.6 APO
is a good example.


Eric Goldstein


---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org 

- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: