[rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- From: "Eric Goldstein" <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:14:29 -0400
Some Sigma lenses are notoriously horrible. The original 400/5.6 APO
is a good example.
Eric Goldstein
--
On 6/25/07, Michael Eric Berube <pj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The Foveon is used in the new Sigma SD14 camera. By all reports it is a
great product.
The only real draw back of this new Sigma camera is that it only takes
Sigma lenses. Maybe they should create a DSLR that takes the 4:3 lenses?
This isn't to say that Sigma lenses are bad, (I make a living with
them)...it is just nice to have more than one choice.
Be well,
Michael Eric Berube
GoodPhotos.com
jon.stanton@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Jim,
>
> Whatever happened to the Foveon chip? It was hot news in Silli Valley
several years ago when I lived there.
>
> jon
>
>
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- Follow-Ups:
- [rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- From: Michael Eric Berube
- References:
- [rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- From: jon . stanton
- [rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- From: Michael Eric Berube
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] OT: A Better Bayer?
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- » [rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
The Foveon is used in the new Sigma SD14 camera. By all reports it is a great product. The only real draw back of this new Sigma camera is that it only takes Sigma lenses. Maybe they should create a DSLR that takes the 4:3 lenses? This isn't to say that Sigma lenses are bad, (I make a living with them)...it is just nice to have more than one choice. Be well, Michael Eric Berube GoodPhotos.com jon.stanton@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Jim, > > Whatever happened to the Foveon chip? It was hot news in Silli Valley several years ago when I lived there. > > jon > > --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- [rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- From: Michael Eric Berube
- [rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- From: jon . stanton
- [rollei_list] Re: OT: A Better Bayer?
- From: Michael Eric Berube