[rollei_list] Marvin Wallace and I Disagree

At 08:11 PM 9/24/2008, Marvin Wallace wrote:
Well we will have to disagree on that point then, particularly that the viewer will not know that the image is cropped. Second I don?t think its good to crop photograph?s either with the enlarger but especially with the knife. I you read my post, I didn?t say you SHOULDN?T use more than one camera; I suggested it is not the best practice and I stick to that sentiment. That the Rolleiflex was not made for square negs is true, but it?s an awful 35mm camera, and proves that there is an inherent limitation with a particular designs. Perhaps the strongest line of evidence, is that if you look at a great photographers, they tend to use 1 maybe 2 cameras, master them and stick to them, Ansel Adams, Cartier Bresson etc? Granted modern artists are a little more eclectic, but the classic photographers, stuck to this idea.
Wow. Trust me on this, the Dag guys didn't crop. Trust me, every photographer since then has cropped. I have seen a lt of historic negatives and have then seen the prints made from them: they were cropped.
Cropped photos are life. I cannot comprehend the sort of anal-retentive mindset which demands that all pictures be printed full-frame. It just does not work that way. Any one who has spent time in a dark room has experienced the process of just HOW to crop a decent negative. A lot of poor pictures produce a great cropped image. 

Marc



msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir!

---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: