[rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:37:27 -0700
----- Original Message -----
From: "Frederic Fichter" <ffichter@xxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 2:18 PM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
Underexposure is entirely my fault.
Processing error ? That's what I thought but it's the only
slide on
the roll that shows these symptoms...
The scan is OK, I have the slide before me and it looks
the same, on
my monitor at least.
Fred
On Oct 13, 2005, at 11:14 PM, Richard Knoppow wrote:
Assuming this isn't the result of aging it looks like a
processing error. Is the original this dark?
If the slide is very underexposed it might be a color
shift from lack of tracking in the film. Its hard to know. I
have a number of Kodachrome travel slides which are of very
dark interiors and are uniformly neutral. All of these were
processed by A&I when they did Kodachrome. To my eye there
is a slight magenta cast to most of them. Since I never had
Kodachrome processed by another lab I don't know if this was
a film characteristic or a processing artifact.
I can fix your image in Photoshop. I tried this to see if
I could figure out what went wrong but its hard to do with a
RBG JPEG of an original CMY image.
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- Follow-Ups:
- [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- From: Frederic Fichter
- References:
- [rollei_list] Kodachrome - the truth
- From: Peter K.
- [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- From: Frederic Fichter
- [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- From: Frederic Fichter
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] Kodachrome - the truth
- » [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- » [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- » [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- » [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- » [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- » [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- » [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- » [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- » [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- » [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- » [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- » [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- » [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- » [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- » [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- » [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- » [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- » [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- » [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
Processing error ? That's what I thought but it's the only slide on
the roll that shows these symptoms...
The scan is OK, I have the slide before me and it looks the same, on
my monitor at least.
Fred
On Oct 13, 2005, at 11:14 PM, Richard Knoppow wrote:
Assuming this isn't the result of aging it looks like a processing error. Is the original this dark?
- [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- From: Frederic Fichter
- [rollei_list] Kodachrome - the truth
- From: Peter K.
- [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- From: Frederic Fichter
- [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [rollei_list] Re: Kodachrome - the truth
- From: Frederic Fichter