You can see in any good book about the WWII with color images why Kodachrome was one of the films preferred to use in graphic arts/printing media for decades, most color images look very good in WWII books printed during the seventies and starting the eighties when did not exist PS, using images about 30 and 35 years old. Even the famous portrait the photographer Steve McCurry took for the NGM about the afghan girl (NGM cover in June 1985, I have it in the magazine about the NGM 100 best covers) was taken using Kodachrome due to this film reputation at the high quality graphic arts/printing media. BTW, the commercial problem for Kodachrome was the process, it's a complex process requiring very high exactness since the dyes couplers are incorporated during the film development, in the other hand the original Agfa color system included the couplers in the film via layers simplifying film development very much and then you have the current color films C-41 and E-6 process based on the old Agfa color system(BTW, the Agfa method had serious problems initially).Kodachrome was changing from the original K-12 process to the current K-14 process, however the main process features did not change very much. I'm thinking about to buy some Kodachrome film in Freestyle, it wouldn't be different regarding the '50s and '60s when my father waited up to three months for his Kodachrome slides: http://www.freestylephoto.biz/1560028-Kodak-Kodachrome-64-iso-35mm-x-36-exp.-KR?cat_id=1301 Carlos Yahoo! Cocina Recetas prácticas y comida saludable http://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/ --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list