[rollei_list] Re: Harrison and Harrison filters
- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:07:58 -0700
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Lilley" <54moggie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 8:45 AM
Subject: [rollei_list] Harrison and Harrison filters
Hi,
I just received the bayonet II to series VI adaptor, a
series VI lens hood
and six series VI filters from Harrison and Harrison.
These are for my
Rollei 3.5F. The adaptor and hood are very well made.
However, at first
blush, the filters look rather "industrial" as they
probably are - the movie
industry. Some of the filters have their name/number
stamped right on the
filter glass itself. I guess the nomenclature will be
hidden once screwed
into the adaptor. The filters are not coated, but I knew
that at time of
order. The price for the package was very inexpensive
compared to B+W, etc.
But... Jeez all this concern about great lenses only to
hang a cheap filter
in front if it. Kinda kicking myself and am just hoping
the photos make my
concerns go away.
Rob
Try cleaning the filters, the print should come off. I
have never heard of printing anything on the glass and there
should be nothing there. If the printing will not come off
return the filters and buy some other brand. _Anything_ on
the filter glass will degrade the image. Also, the filter
type should be marked on the rim. The only unmarked filters
I've ever seen were plain gelatin, which, of course, can't
be marked.
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- Follow-Ups:
- [rollei_list] Re: Harrison and Harrison filters
- From: Jim Brick
- References:
- [rollei_list] Rollei Report 3 reviewed edition
- From: John Lehman
- [rollei_list] Re: Rollei Report 3 reviewed edition
- From: Carlos Manuel Freaza
- [rollei_list] Harrison and Harrison filters
- From: Robert Lilley
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] Harrison and Harrison filters
- » [rollei_list] Re: Harrison and Harrison filters
- » [rollei_list] Re: Harrison and Harrison filters
- » [rollei_list] Re: Harrison and Harrison filters
- » [rollei_list] Re: Harrison and Harrison filters
- » [rollei_list] Re: Harrison and Harrison filters
- » [rollei_list] Re: Harrison and Harrison filters
- » [rollei_list] Re: Harrison and Harrison filters
- » [rollei_list] Re: Harrison and Harrison filters
- » [rollei_list] Re: Harrison and Harrison filters
- » [rollei_list] Re: Harrison and Harrison filters
- » [rollei_list] Re: Harrison and Harrison filters
- » [rollei_list] Re: Harrison and Harrison filters
Hi,I just received the bayonet II to series VI adaptor, a series VI lens hood and six series VI filters from Harrison and Harrison. These are for my Rollei 3.5F. The adaptor and hood are very well made. However, at first blush, the filters look rather "industrial" as they probably are - the movie industry. Some of the filters have their name/number stamped right on the filter glass itself. I guess the nomenclature will be hidden once screwed into the adaptor. The filters are not coated, but I knew that at time of order. The price for the package was very inexpensive compared to B+W, etc.
But... Jeez all this concern about great lenses only to hang a cheap filter in front if it. Kinda kicking myself and am just hoping the photos make my
concerns go away. Rob
- [rollei_list] Re: Harrison and Harrison filters
- From: Jim Brick
- [rollei_list] Rollei Report 3 reviewed edition
- From: John Lehman
- [rollei_list] Re: Rollei Report 3 reviewed edition
- From: Carlos Manuel Freaza
- [rollei_list] Harrison and Harrison filters
- From: Robert Lilley