[rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- From: Slobodan Dimitrov <s.dimitrov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:59:14 -0700
I always keep my lenses to specs.
I do not use Mr Fleenor for any of my service needs.
Slobodan Dimitrov
On Jun 18, 2007, at 12:29 PM, Allen Zak wrote:
Huh? I have an MX-EVS with Xenar that is contrasty as all
gitalong, if anything more so than my 3.5F Planar. Both cameras
and lenses were CLA'd by H. Fleenor within a year or so of each
other. There are character differences between the two lenses, but
contrast is not an issue. Both make beautiful images with
identical processing times. Can it be that the earlier lenses you
encountered had never been cleaned? That would be typical and
could account for your observations.
Allen Zak
On Jun 18, 2007, at 1:38 PM, slobodan dimitrov wrote:
I usually pulled my development times to account for my slight
over exposure, which was about half a stop to 2/3 of a stop. A
method of exposing and processing I still use to this day.
With the Omega lenses, if I missed their strange threshold, such
as too big a pull, I would get flat highlights. If I didn't pull
enough I then would get blown highlights.
At that time I was also the lab tech when the professors weren't
around to guide the students, and also worked at a rental darkroom
with ten stalls. So I got to see a lot of film and prints from
which to draw some fairly basic conclusions about where my gear's
product stood.
As far as shooting with Rolleis, I won't use anything prior to the
early 70's. I'm done with the hassle of split runs to accommodate
for the lower contrast of the earlier lenses. Currently I use a
3.5F, #2830xxxx, and 2.8F white face, Planar and Xenotar
respectively.
s.d.
On Jun 18, 2007, at 9:53 AM, Eric Goldstein wrote:
The whites were either flat, or somewhat blown
out when the lighting ratios exceeded the limits of the materials.
Slo, you are a kidder... This statement belongs in the Irwin Corey
hall of fame! Too funny!
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'subscribe'in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into
www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into
www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- References:
- [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- From: Marvin Wallace
- [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- From: slobodan dimitrov
- [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- From: slobodan dimitrov
- [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- From: slobodan dimitrov
- [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- From: Allen Zak
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- » [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- » [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- » [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- » [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- » [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- » [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- » [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- » [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- » [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- » [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- » [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- » [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- » [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- » [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- » [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- » [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- » [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- » [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- » [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- » [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- » [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- » [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- » [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- » [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
Allen Zak On Jun 18, 2007, at 1:38 PM, slobodan dimitrov wrote:
I usually pulled my development times to account for my slight over exposure, which was about half a stop to 2/3 of a stop. A method of exposing and processing I still use to this day. With the Omega lenses, if I missed their strange threshold, such as too big a pull, I would get flat highlights. If I didn't pull enough I then would get blown highlights. At that time I was also the lab tech when the professors weren't around to guide the students, and also worked at a rental darkroom with ten stalls. So I got to see a lot of film and prints from which to draw some fairly basic conclusions about where my gear's product stood. As far as shooting with Rolleis, I won't use anything prior to the early 70's. I'm done with the hassle of split runs to accommodate for the lower contrast of the earlier lenses. Currently I use a 3.5F, #2830xxxx, and 2.8F white face, Planar and Xenotar respectively.s.d. On Jun 18, 2007, at 9:53 AM, Eric Goldstein wrote:The whites were either flat, or somewhat blown out when the lighting ratios exceeded the limits of the materials.Slo, you are a kidder... This statement belongs in the Irwin Corey hall of fame! Too funny!--- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org- Online, searchable archives are available at http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
--- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- From: Marvin Wallace
- [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- From: slobodan dimitrov
- [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- From: slobodan dimitrov
- [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- From: slobodan dimitrov
- [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic
- From: Allen Zak