Hi Austin, I worked in camera stores in the late 50's and early 60's and saw who was buying Rolleis; There were simply a lot more advanced amateurs than pros. I base it on observation/recollection. In the 60's when I studied photojournalism in college, the market had already swung to 35mm! Regards, Charlie In a message dated 3/25/2010 4:14:21 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, austin.franklin@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: Hi Charlie, I'm curious how you know that to be true. Regards, Austin -----Original Message----- From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Newhouse230@xxxxxxx Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 3:01 PM To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Decline of Rollieflex/Film Yes, there were a lot of photojournalists who used them, but their numbers were dwarfed by the number of 'advanced amateurs'! charlie silverman In a message dated 3/25/2010 2:11:50 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, peterk727@xxxxxxxxx writes: I guess all the Photojournalists who used them for their day to day work did not know they were amateurs. :-) On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Elias_Roustom <_elroustom@xxxxxxxxxx (mailto:elroustom@xxxxxxxxx) > wrote: Rollei TLR cameras were cameras for the advanced amateur market mainly Now that I didn't know. That's really interesting. Old news for you, news to me. Adds to the mystique. Thanks. --- Rollei List - Post to _rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) - Subscribe at _rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) with 'subscribe'in the subject field OR by logging into _www.freelists.org_ (//www.freelists.org/) - Unsubscribe at _rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) with'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into _www.freelists.org_ (//www.freelists.org/) - Online, searchable archives are available at _//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list_ (//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list)