Hi Don - What leads you to believe that the heirs of the deceased artist are always the recipients of their royalties? Eric Goldstein -- On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Don Williams <dwilli10@xxxxxxx> wrote: > At 11:44 PM 12/1/2009, Frank Dernie wrote: > > Why not have copyright end with the death of the original artist/inventor, > he doesn't need the income anymore and it would avoid unseemly arguments > from the family, who have done nothing to earn the income. > > Maybe the artist doesn't need any income but his heirs do. Our friend who's > father won the Oscar for scoring "The Wizard of Oz" gets a few cents every > time "Over the Rainbow" is played and she lives on that income. > > (Interestingly, he didn't write that song but scored the movie and rehearsed > Judy Garland over and over til she got it the way he wanted it.) > > DAW > --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list