The lens resolving power is the ability of the lens to determine fine detail, for a traditional photographic image, the image resolving power is a combo between the lens and film resolving power. The lens contrast has to do with tonal values, the lens contrast is the ability of a lens to distinguish differences for very similar or almost identical tonal values in the image. The point in the Zeiss paper published in the Zeiss info No 51 is that the human eye distinguishes as the best image the image with the best contrast and not the image with the best resolving power, they show very clear examples about it but the images are not on-line. The article shows a photograph about a window in the Aachen cathedral with the best resolving power regarding to see the window details, if you pay atention the image is plenty of details really, however the image looks poor, unsharp due to the lens low contrast; in the other hand the article shows other photograph about identical subject where you can see less resolved details than in the image with the highest resolving power however this photograph looks more sharp clearly because the lens contrast is higher. There are other two photographs (identical subject again)where the resolving power is the same but the contrast different. The image with better contrast looks a lot sharper than the image with low contrast despite the resolving power was identical for both images. It is possible to have poor photos show in high resolution, and good pictures with moderate resolution. Two photos of identical resolution may be entirely different in image quality due to the contrast difference. The lens resolving power is significant for the image quality, but more important and more significant is the lens contrast, this is the Zeiss point for this article.- All the best Carlos --- Neil Gould <neil@xxxxxxxxxxx> escribió: > Hi all, > > The discussion regarding contrast vs. resolution is > interesting and raises > a point that I would like explained. How was > resolution determined > independent of contrast? Today, we see resolution > specifications that > include a contrast figure, and it is "common > knowledge" (a.k.a. layman's > understanding) that lower contrast will accompany > lower resolution > performance. Yet, the comments in this thread state > the opposite! Can one > of you provide a definition and/or a method of > determining resolution that > excludes contrast? > > Regards, > > Neil > > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into > www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging > into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > Compartí video en la ventana de tus mensajes (y también tus fotos de Flickr). Usá el nuevo Yahoo! Messenger versión Beta. http://ar.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/ --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list