[rollei_list] Re: Coated Lenses in Hollywood

Marc,
Actually, Marc, most of messages to me are unread. Most of the LUG messages, which are composed by a group of toadying sycophants are deleted, unread or are filtered out by name. As opposed to RUG mail, which has only one name filtered out. 

Jerry


Richard Knoppow wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Marc James Small" <marcsmall@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 7:35 PM
Subject: [rollei_list] Coated Lenses in Hollywood


At 09:53 PM 4/18/2007, Jerry Lehrer wrote:
>Marc
>
>I wonder what Richard, who is more familiar with the the cinema
>industry, has to say about that.

He already has spoken, Jerry.  Check your unread
messages.  His information conflicts with
information I gleaned from interviewing the guys
who were running the rental shops for Hollywood
in the 1970's (I cleaned a bunch of them out of
their lenses a decade or so back) but Richard's
information is undoubtedly more reliable.

Marc


msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir!
Actually you never know about movie cameramen, maybe some one wanted a particular look and found or throught that uncoated filters gave it to them. Also, not all D.P.s are well educated in the basics of photography. 

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---


---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org 

- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: