[rollei_list] Re: Bokeh (was: Rolleicord IV, APX 100, bokeh)
- From: Ardeshir Mehta <ardeshir@xxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 12:47:20 -0400
On 31-May-05, at 10:19 AM, Carlos Manuel Freaza wrote:
> I have seen some Xenar and Tessar photographs using the five blades
> diaphragm and now I could say that I prefer the ten blades
> diaphragm for the Xenar 3.5/75.
Yes, for good bokeh ten blades will always trump five.
Talking about bokeh: did any of you watch *Star Wars Episode III*?
While watching it I was struck by how well the CGI scenes were made
to simulate bokeh.
I mean, the entire city of Coruscant is computer-generated - there's
just a blue screen in the background! - but whenever the camera
focussed on a face in the foreground, the CGI city faded into soft
focus with marvellous bokeh.
Cheers.
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- Follow-Ups:
- [rollei_list] Re: Bokeh
- From: David Seifert
- References:
- [rollei_list] Rolleicord IV, APX 100, bokeh
- From: Carlos Manuel Freaza
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] Re: Bokeh (was: Rolleicord IV, APX 100, bokeh)
- [rollei_list] Re: Bokeh
- From: David Seifert
- [rollei_list] Rolleicord IV, APX 100, bokeh
- From: Carlos Manuel Freaza