[rollei_list] Re: Bloviating, Part 2: 2/85 Zeiss Sonnar
- From: Carlos Manuel Freaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
I like the 6x6cm square format very much and a considerable number of my shots
are dedicated to that format, however subjects and/or the idea about the
composition require to crop the square or to use 35mm and different lenses
sometimes.
Thank you very much for the kind comment Ed, BTW I regret you no longer are at
Popular Photography :-)
Carlos
--- El jue 16-abr-09, aghalide@xxxxxxx <aghalide@xxxxxxx> escribió:
> De: aghalide@xxxxxxx <aghalide@xxxxxxx>
> Asunto: [rollei_list] Re: Bloviating, Part 2: 2/85 Zeiss Sonnar
> Para: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fecha: jueves, 16 de abril de 2009, 10:36 pm
> Carlos,
>
> I'm extremely impressed with your portraits. And if I
> were still at Popular Photography, I would have liked to
> publish these very sensitive images. I'm also impressed
> that you didn't stick with the 6 x 6 format dictated by
> the Rollei.
>
> Ed Meyers
> -------------- Original message from Carlos Manuel Freaza
> <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: --------------
>
>
> > I only have a Rollei SL 35M (QBM bayonet like the
> 3003) and I don't have the Zeiss Planar 1.4/85 but I
> know and tried it in July 2007 when it was offered to me, an
> excellent lens for portraits since it's a short tele
> Planar design made by Zeiss, the wider f stops allow a clear
> separation subject-background with pleasant bokeh and
> softening the subject hardest features at those wider
> apertures, it's a terrific sharp lens from f 4-f 5.6; I
> did not buy it for three reasons: 1)the price; 2)I had
> covered the focal length with the Rollei TLR lenses and
> Rolleikin; 3) I prefer 200mm lenses for head studies with
> 35mm film format and then I bought a Rolleinar/Mamiya tele
> 3.5/200, a terrific lens for
> > portraits if you use it from the right distance.
> Talking about QBM lenses only, some experts like Prochnow
> consider the Mamiya/Rolleinar lenses for SL35/2000/3000
> cameras _at least_ as good as Zeiss lenses for every point
> of view, outstanding quality construction, very compacts
> > and with modern computer design despite they were
> cheaper lenses.
> >
> > We are on Friday in several places of the world and
> then I'd like to mention two
> > samples linked to the comment above (please consider
> my scanner is not as good
> > for 35mm as for MF):
> >
> > 2.8C Xenotar 2.8/80 with Rolleikin 35mm film adapter:
> > http://www.flickr.com/photos/itarfoto/2244358971/
> >
> > Portrait with Rolleiflex SL 35M QBM, Rolleinar/Mamiya
> 3.5/200 taken at f 4,
> > camera handheld, focus on the eye in shadows:
> > http://www.flickr.com/photos/itarfoto/2744078846/
> >
> >
> > You could see the images largest size too.-
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- El jue 16-abr-09, aghalide@xxxxxxx escribió:
> >
> > > How do you rate the Rollei 3003 with 85mm f1.4
> Zeiss optik
> > > for portraiture?
> > >
> > > Ed Meyers
> > > -------------- Original message from Carlos
> Manuel Freaza
> > > : --------------
> > >
> > >
> > > > I can assure that the Rollei TLR camera with
> the
> > > Rolleikin is more comfortable to take _vertical
> format_
> > > portraits than any 35mm camera provided with tele
> lenses;
> > > things change for the horizontal format, the TLR
> becomes
> > > uncomfortable
> > > > for this case. BTW I agree with you about
> the 6x6cm
> > > film area, it does not make sense to have a MF
> camera to use
> > > it for 35mm, however the Rolleikin is a funny and
> useful
> > > > accesory to use sometimes.
> > > > Tele Mutars are a bit rare and expensive,
> Rollei
> > > recommended to use them at f 5.6 or smaller f
> stop, I have
> > > seen some very good portraits taken with the Tele
>
> > > > Mutar, most of them using tripod.-
> > > >
> > > > Carlos
> > > >
> > > > --- El jue 16-abr-09, Thor Legvold
> escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > De: Thor Legvold
> > > > > Asunto: [rollei_list] Re: Bloviating,
> Part 2:
> > > 2/85 Zeiss Sonnar
> > > > > Para: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > Fecha: jueves, 16 de abril de 2009,
> 9:11 am
> > > > > But by using the Rolleikin, you might
> as well be
> > > shooting a
> > > > > Contax, Nikon or any other small format
> camera.
> > > The whole
> > > > > point of the 'flex is the wonderful
> 6x6cm
> > > film area to
> > > > > capture the image.
> > > > >
> > > > > How often to Tele-Mutar's show up,
> and what
> > > do they
> > > > > generally run?
> > > > >
> > > > > I have the close up adapters, but they
> don't
> > > do the
> > > > > flattering foreshortening that a true
> tele would
> > > for
> > > > > portaits.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Thor
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 16. april. 2009, at 13.46, Carlos
> Manuel
> > > Freaza wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- El mié 15-abr-09, Marc James
> Small
> > > > > escribió:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> ... We Rolleiflex
> > > > > >> TLR users frequently note that
> the sole
> > > drawback
> > > > > to the
> > > > > >> camera is that it is not a
> decent
> > > portrait taker
> > > > > due to its
> > > > > >> normal-lens format. Of course,
> a
> > > Tele-Mutar or
> > > > > Duonar helps
> > > > > >> this out quite a bit!...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I agree if you are trying to take
> a portrait
> > > on the
> > > > > minimal focusing distance point or very
> close to
> > > this point,
> > > > > otherwise normal Rollei TLR lenses are
> very good
> > > for
> > > > > portraits if you are not looking for a
> head study
> > > IMO.
> > > > > > BTW, the Rolleikin converts Rollei
> TLR
> > > normal lenses
> > > > > into terrific -superb-short teles for
> portraits.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Carlos
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yahoo! Cocina
> > > > > > Recetas prácticas y comida
> saludable
> > > > > > http://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > Rollei List
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Post to
> rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Subscribe at
> > > rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> > > > > 'subscribe'
> > > > > > in the subject field OR by logging
> into
> > > > > www.freelists.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Unsubscribe at
> > > rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > with
> > > > > > 'unsubscribe' in the
> subject field
> > > OR by
> > > > > logging into www.freelists.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Online, searchable archives are
> available
> > > at
> > > > > >
> > > http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Rollei List
> > > > >
> > > > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > >
> > > > > - Subscribe at
> rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > with
> > > > > 'subscribe'
> > > > > in the subject field OR by logging into
>
> > > www.freelists.org
> > > > >
> > > > > - Unsubscribe at
> > > rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> > > > > 'unsubscribe' in the subject
> field OR by
> > > logging
> > > > > into www.freelists.org
> > > > >
> > > > > - Online, searchable archives are
> available at
> > > > >
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Cocina
> > > > Recetas prácticas y comida saludable
> > > > http://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/
> > > > ---
> > > > Rollei List
> > > >
> > > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > > - Subscribe at
> rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> > > 'subscribe'
> > > > in the subject field OR by logging into
> > > www.freelists.org
> > > >
> > > > - Unsubscribe at
> rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > with
> > > > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field
> OR by
> > > logging into www.freelists.org
> > > >
> > > > - Online, searchable archives are available
> at
> > > >
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> > > >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Cocina
> > Recetas prácticas y comida saludable
> > http://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/
> > ---
> > Rollei List
> >
> > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'subscribe'
> > in the subject field OR by logging into
> www.freelists.org
> >
> > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with
> > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by
> logging into www.freelists.org
> >
> > - Online, searchable archives are available at
> > http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> >
Yahoo! Cocina
Recetas prácticas y comida saludable
http://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] Bloviating, Part 2: 2/85 Zeiss Sonnar - Marc James Small
- » [rollei_list] Re: Bloviating, Part 2: 2/85 Zeiss Sonnar - Carlos Manuel Freaza
- » [rollei_list] Re: Bloviating, Part 2: 2/85 Zeiss Sonnar - Thor Legvold
- » [rollei_list] Re: Bloviating, Part 2: 2/85 Zeiss Sonnar - Thor Legvold
- » [rollei_list] Re: Bloviating, Part 2: 2/85 Zeiss Sonnar - Ken Frazier
- » [rollei_list] Re: Bloviating, Part 2: 2/85 Zeiss Sonnar - Carlos Manuel Freaza
- » [rollei_list] Re: Bloviating, Part 2: 2/85 Zeiss Sonnar - Marc James Small
- » [rollei_list] Re: Bloviating, Part 2: 2/85 Zeiss Sonnar - Austin Franklin
- » [rollei_list] Re: Bloviating, Part 2: 2/85 Zeiss Sonnar - Thor Legvold
- » [rollei_list] Re: Bloviating, Part 2: 2/85 Zeiss Sonnar - Robert Meier
- » [rollei_list] Re: Bloviating, Part 2: 2/85 Zeiss Sonnar - aghalide
- » [rollei_list] Re: Bloviating, Part 2: 2/85 Zeiss Sonnar - Carlos Manuel Freaza
- » [rollei_list] Re: Bloviating, Part 2: 2/85 Zeiss Sonnar - aghalide
- » [rollei_list] Re: Bloviating, Part 2: 2/85 Zeiss Sonnar - Carlos Manuel Freaza