[rollei_list] Re: Bellows on 2.8D?
- From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:46:28 -0700
Richard,
I did that on my 2.8E2 and saw NO bellows. I won't
bother checking my 2.8F.
Todd could straighten this out.
Jerry
Richard Knoppow wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jerry Lehrer" <jerryleh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "rollei list" <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 6:30 PM
> Subject: [rollei_list] Bellows on 2.8D?
>
> > RUGers,
> >
> > On the Medium Format Forum, some chap stated that his 2.8D
> > had BELLOWS
> > in
> > it. Internally of course. Is this true? My 2.8E2 does
> > not.
> >
> > Eric, I believe that you have a 2.8D.
> >
> > Can someone confirm this?
> >
> > Jerry
> >
> > ---
> My 2.8E definitely has a short bellows. Rack focus out to
> maximum and shine a flashlight at the back of the taking
> lens, you should see a cloth surround there. Presumably,
> this forms a more reliable light trap than the plain
> telescoping tubes on earlier Rolleis. Perhaps it was used on
> only a few models.
>
> ---
> Richard Knoppow
> Los Angeles, CA, USA
> dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
