[rollei_list] Re: Article

  • From: "Eric Goldstein" <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 21:01:31 -0400

The square would not be my first choice for landscapes, though
certainly it has been done and done well. 69 or 612 come to mind if
roll film's you thang...

Eric Goldstein


On 6/2/06, Jim Brick <jim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
At 05:14 PM 6/2/2006 -0700, Peter K. wrote:

>I guess the real question is why are peope using 35mm for
>landscapes? Something like that is much better with a medium format
>camera? Rolleiwide perhaps?


The answer is... because they can. Many great photographers have made
a more than handsome income using 35mm for landscapes. Galen Rowell,
Pat O'Hara, Art Wolfe, George Lepp, Franz Lanting, etc, etc, etc.

Jim 
---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. rollei_list
  3. Archive
  4. 06-2006