[rollei_list] Re: Article
- From: "Peter K." <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 12:30:44 -0700
With all due respect, you know two more than I. The other issue is indeed
AF, while the DMR may be a great way to ensure a future for someone's
investiment in a very expensive manual focus camera, many photographers who
want the latest DSLR, typically look elsewhere.
Peter K
On 5/28/06, Jim Brick <jim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Neil,
I agree with you 100%.
I personally know two photographers that use the DMR professionally.
And they both state that the only way they would give up their DMR is
if it were pried from their cold dead hands!
I personally have absolutely no use for autofocus. But, I can see
where autofocus might have a few uses. Those with incredibly poor
eyesight could benefit. Photojournalists who are in the thick of a
melee could also benefit. That probably sums it up! Oh yeah... point
& shoot happy-snap cameras.
Jim
At 07:17 AM 5/27/2006 -0500, Neil Gould wrote:
>Perhaps your article was submitted before the DMR was generally
available,
>which could account for your not knowing someone who owned & used this
>back. There are several that I know of at this point in time, and you
>won't easily pry the DMR from their hands.
>
>As for using "a manual focus Leica R", there are *many* who derive income
>from the use of such, yours truly included. Are we or are we not "pros"?
>The IRS thinks so. ;-)
>
>I could go on a tirade about autofocus, and how I really hate fighting a
>camera to get the shot I want composed as I intended. Autofocus is the
>most ridiculous idea to come down the pike, especially for medium and
>larger formats. That is one reason why I would never purchase a 6008AF or
>any of its lenses. Autofocus is only acceptable for P&S cameras where the
>largish DOF of the lens makes up for the lack of precision or complicated
>controls necessary to override the camera's intention of focusing on some
>irrelevant aspect of the scene. OK... perhaps I already have committed
the
>tirade. Sorry about that! ;-)
>
>Regards,
>
>Neil
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
--
Peter K
Ó¿Õ¬
- Follow-Ups:
- [rollei_list] Re: Article
- From: Bernard
- References:
- [rollei_list] Re: Article
- From: Neil Gould
- [rollei_list] Re: Article
- From: Jim Brick
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Re: Article
- » [rollei_list] Article - Peter K.
Neil,
I agree with you 100%.
I personally know two photographers that use the DMR professionally. And they both state that the only way they would give up their DMR is if it were pried from their cold dead hands!
I personally have absolutely no use for autofocus. But, I can see where autofocus might have a few uses. Those with incredibly poor eyesight could benefit. Photojournalists who are in the thick of a melee could also benefit. That probably sums it up! Oh yeah... point & shoot happy-snap cameras.
Jim
At 07:17 AM 5/27/2006 -0500, Neil Gould wrote:
>Perhaps your article was submitted before the DMR was generally available, >which could account for your not knowing someone who owned & used this >back. There are several that I know of at this point in time, and you >won't easily pry the DMR from their hands. > >As for using "a manual focus Leica R", there are *many* who derive income >from the use of such, yours truly included. Are we or are we not "pros"? >The IRS thinks so. ;-) > >I could go on a tirade about autofocus, and how I really hate fighting a >camera to get the shot I want composed as I intended. Autofocus is the >most ridiculous idea to come down the pike, especially for medium and >larger formats. That is one reason why I would never purchase a 6008AF or >any of its lenses. Autofocus is only acceptable for P&S cameras where the >largish DOF of the lens makes up for the lack of precision or complicated >controls necessary to override the camera's intention of focusing on some >irrelevant aspect of the scene. OK... perhaps I already have committed the >tirade. Sorry about that! ;-) > >Regards, > >Neil
--- Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- [rollei_list] Re: Article
- From: Bernard
- [rollei_list] Re: Article
- From: Neil Gould
- [rollei_list] Re: Article
- From: Jim Brick