[rollei_list] Re: A Zeiss-Binocular Meet?
- From: Marc James Small <marcsmall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:25:27 -0400
At 05:05 PM 8/27/2008, Jerry Lehrer wrote:
>Marc,
>
>Well then, the only way you doubting Thomases can see the camera is to
>come here to
>Southern California. :-)
>
>BTW, WTF do you think is the genealogy of that Zeiss lens, or the Zeiss
>Ikon focal
>plane shutter body? >:o
Jerry
Do not be deliberately thick-witted and, pray,
quit being snarky. The lens appears to be a
genuine Zeiss product. The camera body is
obviously not a Zeiss product, as Zeiss almost
never makes camera bodies, but it certainly
appears to be a Zeiss Ikon body, a parallel
company owned by the same Foundation which also
owns the Zeiss lensworks, the Schott glassworks,
and the Deckel and Gauthier shutter companies.
During the Depression and after the end of the
Second World War, skilled labor came VERY
cheaply. Thus, there are all sorts of convesions
and modifications floating about -- why not
subscribe to the Internet Directory of Camera
Collectors where the discussion of such is an
almost-daily occurrence. I own a few Zeiss
lenses in LTM which are obvious after-market
modifications. Someone would own a Contax RF
lens and would then pick up a Leica body and it
was the cheapest thing to have your Contax RF
lenses equipped with an RF cam. The going price
for such modifications in New York and Chicago in
the late 1940's was around $5 or $10 a lens.
In camera collecting and photo-historical
circles, the presumption is that such things are
after-market products unless some sort of
provenance can be established such as factory paperwork or the like.
So, yes, the camera you mention certainly seems
to be an aftermarket marriage of a Zeiss lens and
a Zeiss Ikon body. No one has ever found a
catalogue entry for such an offering by Zeiss
Ikon itself, and some of those researching this
have comprehensive sets of Zeiss and Zeiss Ikon catalogues.
Marc
msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir!
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- Follow-Ups:
- [rollei_list] Re: A Zeiss-Binocular Meet?
- From: Don Williams
- References:
- [rollei_list] A Zeiss-Binocular Meet?
- From: Marc James Small
- [rollei_list] Re: A Zeiss-Binocular Meet?
- From: Jerry Lehrer
- [rollei_list] Re: A Zeiss-Binocular Meet?
- From: Marc James Small
- [rollei_list] Re: A Zeiss-Binocular Meet?
- From: Jerry Lehrer
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] A Zeiss-Binocular Meet?
- » [rollei_list] Re: A Zeiss-Binocular Meet?
- » [rollei_list] Re: A Zeiss-Binocular Meet?
- » [rollei_list] Re: A Zeiss-Binocular Meet?
- » [rollei_list] Re: A Zeiss-Binocular Meet?
- » [rollei_list] Re: A Zeiss-Binocular Meet?
- » [rollei_list] Re: A Zeiss-Binocular Meet?
- » [rollei_list] Re: A Zeiss-Binocular Meet?
- » [rollei_list] Re: A Zeiss-Binocular Meet?
- » [rollei_list] Re: A Zeiss-Binocular Meet?
- [rollei_list] Re: A Zeiss-Binocular Meet?
- From: Don Williams
- [rollei_list] A Zeiss-Binocular Meet?
- From: Marc James Small
- [rollei_list] Re: A Zeiss-Binocular Meet?
- From: Jerry Lehrer
- [rollei_list] Re: A Zeiss-Binocular Meet?
- From: Marc James Small
- [rollei_list] Re: A Zeiss-Binocular Meet?
- From: Jerry Lehrer