[rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- From: "Eric Goldstein" <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:44:43 -0400
You will get illumination to the corners with this lens on 45 but I
believe the circle of good definition is quite a bit smaller and not
designed to cover this format. The 65/8 SA is designed as a 23 lens,
and the Angulon has less coverage...
Eric Goldstein
--
On 8/31/07, Laurence Cuffe <cuffe@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've shot the same lens (65mm angulon) on a 5x4 using the linhof close focus
> board. You get the full circle of the image on the film. (snipped)
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- References:
- [rollei_list] 6 x 9 search
- From: Jan Decher
- [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- From: Mike Bischof
- [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- From: rcreason-1
- [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- From: Laurence Cuffe
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- [rollei_list] 6 x 9 search
- From: Jan Decher
- [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- From: Mike Bischof
- [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- From: rcreason-1
- [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- From: Laurence Cuffe