[rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:13:13 -0700
----- Original Message -----
From: <aghalide@xxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 9:37 AM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
yes. I bought a Medalist and converted it to 120 roll
film. Hard to handle but the Ektar lens is worth the
bother/.. Ed
BTW, this lens is virtually identical to the 105mm,
f/3.7 Ektar sold by Kodak for use on small press cameras.
The speed difference is due to the maximum aperture limit of
the Supermatic shutter it was sold in.
This is a Heliar type lens built according to the Altman
patent. Altman wrote that he used the extra element to help
correct "rim-rays" to reduce the aberration of the lens at
maximum aperture. Other lenses in this series include the
50mm and 75mm Kodak Enlarging Ektar and some others. Altman
appears to be one of very few designers outside of
Voigtlander to exploit the Heliar type.
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- References:
- [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- From: aghalide
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- » [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search
- From: aghalide