[rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar

Only some of the 2.8 A JenaTessar cells were mismatched. Others were fine.


I have a later 2.8 A with an Oberkocken Tessar that is quite soft.

todd




On 14-Nov-06, at 12:26 PM, James & Christiane Thompson wrote:

Thanks for the information. As I mentioned, I am just curious if any "improvements" were made to the design. I am quite happy with the performance of my particular lens. Even wide open, this lens has useful applications, and actually isn't as poor a performer as ancient lore has led us to believe. For proof, type "Rolleiflex A, 2.8 Tessar" into the search engine at photo.net. There I have uploaded several images, several of which are at 2.8

Ciao,
Jim
--
"Ein Herz für Kinder" - Ihre Spende hilft! Aktion: www.deutschlandsegelt.de Unser Dankeschön: Ihr Name auf dem Segel der 1. deutschen America's Cup-Yacht!
---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list


---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: