[rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:38:35 -0800
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carlos Manuel Freaza" <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 6:32 PM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
Marc, you wrote: "...I have no explanation for the
existence of the Prewar 2.8/8cm CZJ Tessars --
the first Rolleiflex batch was of only 2 lenses
and was completed on 2 FEB 1938; the other
Rolleiflex batches date from the first half of
1939...." and now you ask "Why would F&H order 5,000
lenses which didn't meet their needs?"
My answer was and is that Rollei used the two 1938
lenses to develop the 1939 2.8 prototype, and Rollei
needed the lenses for the camera series production,
the 1939 prototype was ready for production and that
was the reason to buy the lenses on 1939, Rollei
needed the lenses but due to the war Rollei couldn't
obtain the tooling to manufacture the camera for the
market. The 1939 prototype and that Rollei had
projected to manufacture the prototype for the market
on 1939 are facts, the 1939 lenses batch bought from
Zeiss for this camera production is my conclusion,
and according Prochnow the lens was recomputed to meet
F&H quality needs and then Prochnow has to do too.-
All the best
Carlos
All of this ignores the f/2.8 Tessar used on some baby
Rolleis and Sports Rollei. I have never heard any complaints
about this lens. Of course, we don't know for certain that
it is the same prescription as the 80mm f/2.8.
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- Follow-Ups:
- [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- From: Carlos Manuel Freaza
- References:
- [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- From: Carlos Manuel Freaza
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- » [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
Marc, you wrote: "...I have no explanation for theexistence of the Prewar 2.8/8cm CZJ Tessars -- the first Rolleiflex batch was of only 2 lenses
and was completed on 2 FEB 1938; the other Rolleiflex batches date from the first half of 1939...." and now you ask "Why would F&H order 5,000 lenses which didn't meet their needs?" My answer was and is that Rollei used the two 1938 lenses to develop the 1939 2.8 prototype, and Rollei needed the lenses for the camera series production, the 1939 prototype was ready for production and that was the reason to buy the lenses on 1939, Rollei needed the lenses but due to the war Rollei couldn't obtain the tooling to manufacture the camera for the market. The 1939 prototype and that Rollei had projected to manufacture the prototype for the market on 1939 are facts, the 1939 lenses batch bought from Zeiss for this camera production is my conclusion, and according Prochnow the lens was recomputed to meet F&H quality needs and then Prochnow has to do too.- All the best Carlos
- [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- From: Carlos Manuel Freaza
- [rollei_list] Re: 2.8 80mm Opton-Tessar
- From: Carlos Manuel Freaza