[rollei_list] Re: 120/220 modification

I understand it works just fine and was considering it myself but I found
220 too hard to find in the films I most like and seriously wonder how long
it will be made.  120 I can see still be around for quite some time but 220
no.  I decided it was too much for a small convenience that might one day be
useless or almost so.

-- 
Richard S.
San Francisco

My New Photography Website
http://www.lightshadowandtone.com

My Flickr River
http://flickriver.com/photos/rich8155/popular-interesting/

My Commute Photo Blog
http://shootingonthefly.blogspot.com/

On 6/29/08, Masumi Yamamuro <surgeon24hrs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  I know I am kid of a lazy guy.
>
> When I shoot mediaum format, I prefere using 220 films. It is just becase I
> do not have to change rolls very often, especially when I am using slide
> films with a lot of bracketings. I take a lot of street photos. It is a
> little awkward to change rolls on the street frequently.
>
> My 2.8F does not take 220 films.
>
> I found on Mr. Harry Fleenor's web site that he does 120/220 modification.
> *www.rolleirepairs.com/220mod.html*<http://www.rolleirepairs.com/220mod.html>This
>  sounds good for a lazy guy like me.
>
> Has anybody had this modification? Any opinions about pros and cons?
>
> Thanks, in advance, for help me deciding.
>
> ------------------------------
> マイクロソフトの最新次世代ブラウザIE7にMSN版ならではの便利な機能をプラス 
> http://promotion.msn.co.jp/ie7/<http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/msnjpqjl0040000003gbl/direct/01/>
>

Other related posts: